Welcome!

Thanks for stopping by! I hope you'll visit regularly for new articles on everything from parenting to education to social justice.

For more information on my book Faith Deployed: Daily Encouragement for Military Wives, visit the Web site here. And if you're on Facebook and looking for ongoing support and encouragement from a network of military wives, join the group for Faith Deployed readers.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Embryo Adoption the Answer to Couples' Prayers

A white cradle sat empty at the foot of Maria and Jeff Lancaster’s bed. Maria, 46 years old at the time, had recently suffered her third miscarriage and since in vitro fertilization and adoption were not viable options for the couple, they were told to give up the dream of parenthood. Maria refused.

Six years earlier, she had gone to Cedar Park Assembly of God in Bothell, Wash., where Pastor Joe Fuiten prayed over her and other couples struggling to have children during what Fuiten calls Presentation Sunday. She was still waiting for God’s answer to that prayer.

“After my miscarriage, we were devastated,” she says. “I thought, ‘I’m going to die of despair if I don’t do something that opposes the natural.” That’s when she purchased the cradle as an act of faith that the Lord would fulfill her desire to have a child.

Months passed. Socks accumulated in the cradle. Then one day, an idea from a Dr. Dobson radio program rocked their world: embryo adoption.

Here’s how it works: When a couple does in vitro fertilization, often more embryos are created than ultimately are needed to increase the chances of a successful pregnancy. Only two or three of the healthiest embryos are placed back into the woman’s body to avoid the risks to both babies and mother associated with multiple pregnancy, such as quadruplets, quintuplets, etc. (One high-profile exception is the case of Nadya Suleman, who gave birth to octuplets from in vitro fertilization on Jan. 26, 2009.) Any remaining embryos can be frozen for possible future use. Embryos can also be donated for adoption to another couple.

When the Lancasters learned of embryo adoption, only 10 babies in the U.S. had been born this way. After months of soul-searching and prayer, they decided to go for it.

Embryos which had been frozen for four years, at the two-cell stage, arrived via FedEx from a North Carolina clinic and were thawed and implanted in Maria’s uterus in a painless, two-minute procedure. Nine months later, Elisha Ramiah Lancaster was born, September 5, 2003. She was the first “Snowflake baby,” as Maria says, to be born in the state of Washington, and only the 35th in the nation. Today she is a lively five-year-old with an affinity for horses and dressing up like a princess.

According to Dr. Christina Powell, AG minister and research fellow at Harvard University in Boston, embryos can remain viable for a decade or more if they are frozen properly. “However, not all embryos survive the thawing process,” she says. “Typically about 60-70 percent survive cryopreservation. The probability that an embryo will grow to be full-term before being born is about one in 10 for embryos frozen less than five years, and lower for embryos that have been frozen longer.”

Elisha Lancaster has a simpler explanation for how she was born: “She tells me that Jesus sent her to us,” says Maria. “She was just the right one and God sent her.”

Maria is now executive director of Embryo Adoption Services at Cedar Park (www.adoptanembryo.net), a ministry of the church which had prayed for her 12 years ago to have a child. The service opened in November 2008, and by March 2009 is already working with 60 families from across the U.S. as well as Canada, Sweden, Jamaica and England.

“It’s a need people have, a need we can fill,” says Pastor Fuiten. “We are a church that does God’s work—and we think having a family is part of God’s work.” (The church also runs a funeral home, several counseling offices, a mechanic shop, studio, thrift store and the largest evangelical school system in North America.)

“Something that was once a great anguish for my husband and I has turned into our ability to share this opportunity and joy with other people,” says Maria. “Some couples can’t afford regular adoption, or are too old like we were, or in vitro fertilization is not an option. There are a lot of people like us who, if they don’t adopt an embryo, will never have kids.”

Though there are 500,000 frozen embryos in storage in the U.S., Cedar Park is one of only seven embryo adoption services in the U.S. according to www.embryoadoption.org, and the only church-based service. The Snowflakes Frozen Embryo Adoption Program run by Nightlight Christian Adoptions has resulted in 199 births in the last decade, and the five-year-old National Embryo Donation Center has logged 109.

In embryo adoption, the donating family chooses the family which will adopt their remaining embryos in the freezer. Couples seeking to adopt apply and go through a home study screening. Donating and adopting couples can also choose how much contact to have with each other. The Lancasters have exchanged letters and pictures with Elisha’s genetic parents and hope to someday meet them.

“We aim to make embryo adoption as financially affordable as possible,” says Fuiten. “When you see families being able to have children, that’s very valuable. It’s also valuable as a teaching mechanism about the ways of God. We’re able to speak quite clearly to issues of sanctity of life and abortion. We are helping shape the values of the culture by thinking of embryos.”
The basic definition of what constitutes life, says Dr. Powell, leads to the conclusion that a new human life begins when an embryo is formed. “The question debated in our society today is when does human personhood begin,” she continues. “While the birth of healthy babies from frozen embryos does not address these questions, seeing these healthy babies reminds everyone of the value of human life contained within each embryo.”

The Lancasters have always been pro-life, but their experience with Elisha “revolutionized” their consideration of embryos. “We must fight for the embryos that are in the freezer that are just human beings in a freezer,” says Maria. “The embryo should be greatly valued and treasured for the potential of a born human being. Nothing else compares to it. Even Dr. Seuss knows, ‘A person’s a person, no matter how small.’”

3 comments:

Mark said...

I hardly know how to reply to your post because it feels as if to desire to resist this "answer to prayer" one is working against the will of God; yet with all my heart I wish...want...hope...that writers, ethicists, potential parents reflect long on the child that will be born.

This child, who, we expect, will grow up...will face questions about the origin of his life that no one around him will have any idea about. In order to incorporate the story of his origin into his life he will have to be granted the story...he will want to know where he was kept; what the facilities were like; what the social circumstances were that produced so many embryos and the cultural debates. Did anyone argue that he must know his genetic roots? Did anyone preserve this? Were all these God fearers at all imaginative?

These children will be a new generation. What they disclose about their experiences may take a long time...longer perhaps than the parents who give him birth have.

The intense excitement these technologies offer for parents who long to have children...and for those who believe this sort of "rescue" is God's will...clouds critical reflection about doing this. Slow down. Experience of adoptees who have complex origin stories should give pause. Look at the Korean adoptees or Vietnamese in Outsiders Within, for example.

One is rooted and grounded by history; these children will be historically challenged in ways easily dismissed and ignored. Think how George Orwell in 1984 observed how a future society would rewrite history. Once people thought it was outrageous. The history of these children will be tenuous...and their relationship to life will reflect their relationship to the past.

Anonymous said...

Hi Mark,

Maria Lancaster here. I am the mother in this story, my daughter the adopted child.

Most people, born in a variety of hardships and difficult cicumstances would in the end, still be grateful they were born.

What's you answer to their plight?
Research? Discarded? Frozen forever?

It's amazing you are on your critical high horse, yet I doubt you have a better solution. Or any solution, for that matter.

We are attempting to demonstate that we actually beleive that life in fact does begin at conception, by treating embryos with the same care and concern we give born children.

Adoptees of all sorts have stories, but in the end I doubt there would be many that say they wished they were never born.

The answer lies in the love we give them, the care and nurturing we show them, God gives grace, and a life is lived with COUNTLESS generations that lie ahead from each born child.

Mark said...

The only answer I offer is to urge those who are set upon this course is to preserve the descendent's history. Their genesis story will matter to them.

It would also help to speak to donor conceived adults about their stories. What it was like and how they would propose policy and practice develop.

Some of this should be common sense. But in novel situations like such as this can be hard to remember. Everyone wants their story, truthfully told. They also want to be heard when it is their time to be heard. These people when they mature may not be uniformly uncritical about the circumstances of their creation.